(taking to http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/sections.html#the-nav-element).

Sports

But even if not…why would you care…surely the third paragraph is of no matter to a summary? Hey there, In this section, I have made a nice conceptual circuit diagram that will help you to understand how ALU inside the computer works. Examples include chapters in a book, the various tabbed pages in a tabbed dialog box, or the numbered sections of a thesis.
We mean only use a
when it’s semantically appropriate.
)

Lost the < > on the way, here it is again, sorry: “How can you semantically group anything without being able to give a name to the group?” Should be clearly stated that, besides the emphasis already made: This accepts all the characters including alphabets, numbers, special characters, punctuations, etc. The layout is going to be the top header , the middle layer, which will consist of 3 content boxes, and the footer ofcourse. Conceptually speaking, apparently and as far as I can see: we can’t. I’d contribute meta goods towards article’s (or quite possibly ), more than likely only with

, a class on a

wrapping the content, or even .entry p:first-of-type {…} as we do here are all better options. Are we just supposed to screw off and use forever? # * Don’t use it just as hook for styling or scripting; that’s a div. Your code example seems to be just the whole page content surrounded by, I am guessing in the instance that the element does not have or need a heading, you would not use a section element. Case in point: The US Constitution. The article definition seems clear at this point: “An article about a birth can be on our site or, as well, on a nature section of a journal.

Tsunami omfg

Thanks! Yes or no. Well one more issue is, section can have h1,h2,h3…. As for the usefulness of the outline algorithm when dealing with tag soup, I think you may well have a point. He made his own screenreader that listens out for certain ids or class names like “navigation”, “menu”, “sidebar” so that his screenreader can skip the peripheral information on repeated views. In it’s current assigned role, SECTION simply becomes useless to most of the web. According to this section seems a bigger and more generic container that the one you describe in this page. Is a intro. , Obviously the semantics could vary as necessary; class names could be ids instead, and so on.
Deletes the selected section and merges slides with the previous section. )

You might use menu and command elements. I am building a new portfolio site.

(main content of blog article)

@Smittie — but the sections of a newspaper could easily use
s:
HTML 5 is really awesome and I love coding with it. Unless you’re running something smart like Google AdSense, which *tries* to relate to the content on the page, most ads are just going to be whoever is paying the most. A cash or deferred arrangement (CODA) is a specific method of funding a qualified … The article element represents a self-contained composition in a document, page, application, or site and that is intended to be independently distributable or reusable Step 3 − By default, the new section is named "Untitled Section" but you can change the section name. […]. In any case, in the normal text/html serialisation, a

tag implicitly closes a previous paragraph – they can’t be nested. Or is it proper to use as section > header > h1 ? “The header element can also be used to wrap a section’s table of contents, a search form, or any relevant logos”. (I believe this point is clear so, no alternatives were presented). Under the about me section, will have a h1 style for about me, and then content in a p tag underneath it. @alohci is right: the outliner is not a validator. You could also include the foreword and preface, possibly table of contents. The position of the expression within the linker script determines whether it is absolute or relative. and why? Use the most appropriate element, @Oli: thanks for that, clouds of confusion passing, bright spells of illumination to follow, […] html5doctorに以下の一文があります. @Michael Johnson: Almost. ? I think you guys were right the first time. Untitled definition, without a title: an untitled gentleman; an untitled book. # When I think semantic I’m thinking of viewing the code in a text editor and being able to envision how the page is laid out without having to look at the page in a browser. We doctors are a bunch of chums using HTML5 and writing about how we do it. It’s probably best to keep using divs to structure content within an article or section element. I think that a nice rule of thumb might be to consciously add a title for each

, even if you then hide the title with CSS (as is generally the case with